Copying Images on the Internet is Illegal
General Announcements, bay-area-website-design Add commentsEveryone has done it. Its much too easy nowadays to copy any images off internet websites. Most people do it without permission from the website owner or stock photo company. If your thinking about doing it, think again.
Having been a victim of others copying my work, my design, and words– I understand the feelings and violation of one’s original work being given credit by someone else. It is distasteful and makes me angry. But what can really be done about it? The internet is so vast and wide that does someone actually go around and police the text or images and control what is being plagerized or downloaded illegally?
Even in doing my research for this post, I performed a search on google for “copying images on the internet”, all results displayed me how to accomplish this and none really spoke about NOT doing it which prompted this post. This post is not about the specific laws for copyrighting or the robbery prevelent on the web. It is about real life experience and ethics.
It is better to heir on caution and not copy anything from the internet unless it specifically indicates its okay to do so or if they give terms asking you to create a link back to the image owner’s site. You also want to make sure you take a snapshot of that website that indicates permission for you to download or copy images. You never know if there policy may change in a few years and you don’t want to get in a situation that leaves you without documentation of their approval.
There are a large number of stock photo companies on the web today. These companies have their terms of usage agreement on the website however, if your like me– its often difficult to understand the legal jargon that is indicated on these long contracts. I have known several people who have been fined a large some of money for copying images from these large stock photo companies.
In case your not familiar with why these stock companies allow you to register and then download images which have their watermark on the corner of the photo, its mainly to be used for “comping” purposes only. “Comping” refers to the process of drafting a design and using the image with the hope of purchasing that image when its distributed publicly.
In speaking with one stock photo company in particular, I was informed that they have software to comb the internet a section at a time to find violators of their usage terms. If you have a website that is indexed by Google, it is considered to be a live website to the stock photo company. So if you have unlicensed photos on that website, you are open to being fined and are in violation of their terms.They come up with a list of violators regularly who use their images for websites and print illegally. This is the sophistication of software and internet technology that we are in and continue to head towards. Once you get a letter from these company’s legal department, you must produce written documentation on your license to use the images or pay the fine indicated in their demand letter. If you do not have a license, you need to pay the fine and remove the images within a certain timeframe.
The safest thing to do is purchase your images from a stock photo company. There are many inexpensive companies that offer reasonable rates per photo. I have found that www.dreamstime.com offers one of the best packages with the largest amount of variety. If you are unsure of the terms, contact the stock photo company and speak with a representative to make sure you are clear on how you are able to use the photos you purchase.
Another alternative is to take your own photos and use them on your website or print material. Of course, then you risk people copying YOUR images. Make sure you put a watermark or statement on your website regarding the copying of your images are NOT permissible or if you do allow copying, then state that as well.
Remember, that if you are unsure, don’t do it. It’s not worth the aggravasion and headache you later may face.















October 20th, 2008 at 2:58 am
Yup, as the internet grows, the easier it is to steal other people’s work. These micro stock companies are definately not a new thing. At least images are cheap and legal!
Dreamstime is awesome.But i personally use http://www.123rf.com
December 8th, 2008 at 10:02 pm
I wonder if taking a snap-shot of old photos, that have never even probably been held under any copyright law, is illegal. I don’t think all images are held under a copy right, i think some are just there for the public, they are not anything special. But when it comes to more serious stuff, you should always watch out and make sure everything is in order.
December 8th, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Yes, your right Josue not all images are under copyright law. There are photos on the web that are called “public domain” and are free to use. But of course, the website needs to state that you can use those images for whatever purpose you want.
The thing about taking snapshots of old photos is a tricky one. I would always heir on caution rather than risk getting slapped with a lawsuit. It’s definitely tempting but its best to walk away.
December 17th, 2008 at 11:53 am
It is not illegal to “download” pictures, it is illegal to reproduce those images as your own and sell them. I can put your images on my blog and say “See these pictures? aren’t they great? (Made by blah blah)” That is under the fair use (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use) policies of many countries. Just my 2 cents, though.
February 27th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
csmith is completely wrong. It is illegal to put other’s images on a website or blog without their permission. Fair use is a very complicated matter and does not generally allow copying of works. It allows some use for educational, or parody, or one or two other matters but not copying generally.
If something is not in the public domain, it cannot be copied.
February 27th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
I agree that for the average person, the legalities of copyright laws are can be complicated. It is safer to heir on safe and always ask permission, unless specifically stated on the website that you MAY copy or if its noted as public domain. Thanks for making that point.
May 26th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
is it illegal to take a picture say of elvis and put it on your website
May 26th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
I think if the picture your taking of Elvis has a signature or is clearly been taken by someone, then yes–it would be illegal to place it on your website even though you’ve taken the picture.
I am not a copyright attorney so I am basing my comments on my own knowledge. Better to heir on caution.
June 17th, 2009 at 8:43 am
I must dissagree. When it comes right down to it, like with any book you publish, you must COPYRIGHT your work in order to claim any sort of ownership to it. Same goes for the internet. ANYONE can claim that THEY are ones that took that photo or designed that image. Unless you register the image or photo as YOURS you have absolutely NO rights to it. Some RESPONSABILITY must be taken by those posting these unprotected images and photos on the internet. It\’s kind of like me taking picture of a tree and. Then I post it on some public bulletin board in a coffee shop somewhere. Then months later it ends up on the cover of someones book on the best sellers list. Do I then have rights to that photo???? NO!!!!! I would not be able to PROVE that the image was taken by me…either would I be able to claim any rights to it. SAME THING ON THE INTERNET!!!
June 17th, 2009 at 8:50 am
Excellent point ownmine. Let’s look at the recent U.S. family who was on the front page of Yahoo last week. This family’s Christmas photo ended up posted for some ad in Europe! A friend of the family happened to be vacationing in Europe and saw their photo large and posted in front of a commercial business for some ad! I think the family said they had posted their photo on the internet and look where it ended up!